McGraw-Hill Construction
   subscriptions  •   advertise  •   careers  •   contact us  •   my account  
 



email a friend  |  printer friendly version
Buildings

Building Demolition Begins in New Orleans

(archrecord.construction.com - 03/13/2006)

By Angelle Bergeron


Photo: Associated Press

Photo: Courtesy Angelle Bergeron

Demolition in the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans.
Photo: Courtesy Angelle Bergeron

Building demolition in New Orleans has just begun, while rebuilding efforts in the city continue to be stymied by uncertainties. Meanwhile, preservationists, architects and structural engineers are still hard at work trying to save the city's historic neighborhoods and significant structures from demolition.

On March 6 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers began tearing down the first 125 homes in the city that had been identified as a "risk to public health and safety." These were slated to be destroyed by the end of the month, says John Fogarty, assistant area engineer tasked with debris removal and demolition for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Structures in the first wave of demolition were located in public rights of way, and the majority were in the Lower Ninth Ward neighborhood, Fogarty said.

"Initially, 5,500 homes were red-tagged, and half of those were deemed at risk of imminent collapse," says Malana Joseph, a spokesperson for Mayor C. Ray Nagin's office. Demolition was stalled by a January civil suit, filed by residents who argued that the proposed demolition would violate their constitutional rights. A Federal Court ruling allowed the city to proceed with demolition, but only after following specific guidelines to notify owners. The delay won enough time for preservationists and the city's Office of Safety and Permits to re-evaluate structures. They cut the list in half.

"In the early days, there were all kinds of rumors going around saying 50,000 homes were going to be demolished," says Kevin Mercadel, program officer for the New Orleans office of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Fears were justified, considering that initial assessments were conducted under emergency debris-removal contracts let by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Mercadel says the responsibility for assessing damaged properties then filtered down through numerous subcontracts, until it became difficult to determine who actually tagged properties, andwhat criteria they used. He adds that most inspectors did not have construction expertise. "They were red tagging buildings left and right and we couldn't figure out why."

advertisement

Fearing that historic structures would be hastily destroyed, the New Orleans Preservation Resource Center (PRC) partnered with the National Trust for Historic Preservation to organize volunteer architects and structural engineers from across the country to re-evaluate properties. Mike Centineo, director of the city's Office of Safety and Permits, personally inspected 5,500 tagged building and reduced the citywide number to 1,900, Mercadel said. "We identified 369 red tagged in historic districts, and 199 of those can be saved."

The former home of jazz musician Kidd Skidmore, at the corner of Deslonde and Rampart Streets in the historic Holy Cross neighborhood, is one building that was spared demolition. Mercadel says that home had been red-tagged because the front wall was separated from the structure, a problem caused by bad repairs that occurred before Katrina. "It's a simple repair that requires jacking it up, repairing the wall and re-attaching it," says Mercadel.

Like the Skidmore house, many of the red-tagged structures were in poor condition prior to Katrina, including termite damage, rot, or poor construction, Mercadel says. Much of that is easily repaired.

It seems nothing in the New Orleans is moving quickly, not even the demolition, so preservationists will likely have ample time to rescue more structures. Images of vast acres being bulldozed into oblivion are readily squashed by the reality of the painstakingly, deliberate demolition process. This process must take into account human remains, hazardous materials like asbestos and air conditioner refrigerant, and the risk that falling buildings may cause injuries.

Waste disposal is also becoming a concern. At an estimated 275 cubic yards of debris per home, the Corps is concerned that approved landfills may max out before demolition is complete. For now, demolition is in a holding pattern until the widely dispersed owners of the next 2,100 identified structures can be notified the Corps' Fogarty says.





Subscribe to ENR and get unlimited access to ENR.com

sponsors

 |   |   |   |   | 
2008 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
All Rights Reserved