McGraw-Hill Construction
   subscriptions  •   advertise  •   careers  •   contact us  •   my account  
 



email a friend  |  printer friendly version
Buildings

No Reasonable Precautions Could Have Prevented Collapses

(enr.com - 4/08/02 issue)

By Nadine Post

A draft copy of an unpublished building performance study of the collapse of the World Trade Center towers cites their "design and construction characteristics" as key to their ability to withstand immediate failure after two hijacked airliners slammed into them. The Sept. 11 collapse was caused by the combination of the attack and resulting fires.

The study is to be released by the American Society of Engineers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency by early May. It was obtained and portions published by the New York Times. "The ability of the two towers to withstand aircraft impact without immediate collapse was a direct function of their design and construction characteristics, as was the vulnerability of the two towers to collapse as a result of the combined effects of the impacts and ensuing fires," according to the draft.

"The first federal assessment of the trade center disaster...has made clear that there may have been no reasonable precautions that could have stopped the towers from collapsing once they were struck and huge fires broke out," says the Times.

The draft report confirms that fireproofing, fire suppression systems and water supply for hoses were disabled. It also says that the blaze triggered by plane fuel was so intense that it "drove temperatures as high as 2,000° F and generated heat equivalent to the energy output of a nuclear powerplant."

Neither ASCE or FEMA would comment before the final report is released.

Last week, FEMA and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md., issued a statement that the two entities have entered into a memorandum of understanding that designated NIST to serve "as a research and technical resource" for FEMA.

The agreement, intended to "support the federal government's capabilities to reduce national disaster losses and enhance homeland security," was in the works before Sept. 11. "It was just pushed to the forefront by the World Trade Center," says Michael Newman, a NIST spokesman. The agreement gives NIST the ability to be called into play by FEMA sooner, he adds.

Among other plans, NIST and FEMA will implement a process fo "plan, prioritize, select and fund projects...in fire, disaster prevention and homeland security."

There is no money involved in the agreement. However, NIST expects $16 million from FEMA's homeland security appropriation, now before Congress, for a two-year technical study into the post-attack performance of the trade center.

NIST is already planning to begin the study, though Newman says there is no way of knowing how fast funds will become available. Some 60 pieces of steel likely to reveal information on the sequence of events were set aside at scrap yards by the members of the Structural Engineers Association of New York and are in storage at NIST.





Subscribe to ENR and get unlimited access to ENR.com

sponsors

 |   |   |   |   | 
2008 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
All Rights Reserved