McGraw-Hill Construction
   subscriptions  •   advertise  •   careers  •   contact us  •   my account  
 
advertising

| RSS Info >>>


Technology Companies Streamline Permitting Process

January 25, 2001

By Eric Blum

Information technology is providing new tools to ease one of the building industry's more pervasive annoyances: permitting. More than a dozen companies are racing to get permit seekers out of line by allowing them to file online.

"Pulling permits is the most fundamental pain in the ass in the construction industry," says one dot-com executive. The new Web permitting companies are soothing this pain today, and many of the companies are adding more ambitious interactive services for the filing of new construction plans, which will fundamentally improve engineering and architectural plan review.

These new services make use of Internet technology and proven Web-based applications. For reconstruction, filing "over the counter" typically requires an applicant to drive to city hall, obtain and fill out a form, wait for verification that it was completed correctly and, finally, pay a fee all to be handed a blank permit. Inspectors sign off on the permit when the work is done.

Under the online system, the applicant logs on to a Web site, accesses and fills out the appropriate form, pays for it with a credit card, prints out the final document and goes to work. A key to the Web-based services is ease of use. A potential user who has the ability to access this story on construction.com has all the skills needed to successfully use online permitting.

The benefits of the new system are speed and convenience. The online permit counter is accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a week, with no waiting. There is no need for the trip to city hall, reducing traffic and pollution and preserving prime work hours for work. Governments have the opportunity to streamline their permitting operations and enter the world of e-government at little or no cost.

"The old way [of filing for permits] was very tedious, very time consuming and very inefficient," says Chris Guslani of Hot Water Inc., San Francisco, a company that provides plumbing services to Sears, Home Depot and others. Guslani says his company started using online permitting last November. Hot Water Inc. uses NetClerk's Permit Central and pays a monthly fee for the service. Today most jurisdictions in the Bay Area accept automated applications, he says.

"Now I can permit 15 to 20 jobs in 40 or 45 minutes," Guslani says. "Before I'd be lucky to get one permit in 45 minutes."

The San Francisco area got a jump-start in this arena through the work of Smart Permit, a project of Joint Venture: Silicon Valley Network, which served as an incubator for technological innovation in the Bay Area.

Contractors typically pay for the convenience of online filing. The time savings make the economics work, Guslani says. Automated permitting usually is free to governments although some subsidize the service, such as Miami-Dade County in Florida.

In most cities, online permitting is in planning or is very new. In Alameda, Calif. the automated permitting system kicked off last fall and successfully processed its first two automated permits that week. Greg McFann, the building official for the city of Alameda, says that their system is part of the city council's effort to improve customer service through comprehensive e-government.

"Our system not only allows for permit filing, it allows for scheduling inspections and it allows homeowners to check the status of the work," McFann says. Alameda uses Accela's VelocityHall, although it would be willing to work with any company that is able to tie into the city's database, McFann says.

"We're very happy so far," McFann says, adding the city hopes to incorporate the ability to automate more complex plan-type applications. "This is our first entry. We plan to work our way up."

The dot-com companies rolling out these services are racing to enlist as many jurisdictions and permit filers as possible to establish leadership in the market. Many of these companies are spin-off activities of long-time providers of software solutions for government, so they already have a relationship with the jurisdiction and extensive knowledge of how to make the connection between the contractor and the government's employees and back-office computer networks.

Some firms are proceeding without officially partnering with jurisdictions, choosing to automate the permit application process and then deliver the completed permit in any manner the jurisdiction prefers. This allows for a faster geographical rollout, but lessens the immediate interactivity of the service.

Most of these firms have tested and started marketing their permitting products within the last year, so it is too early to speculate on future market share or profitability. Leaders of these online permitting companies admit that it is unlikely that all firms will succeed long-term, especially given the increased pressure of the recent dot-com shakeout. The future may well include consolidations, partnering and, for those that dawdle, failure.

VelocityHall-Partnering with Government

South San Francisco-based Accela last summer introduced VelocityHall as its online permitting product. VelocityHall is a Web-based service that connects directly and deeply into local government's back office computer systems, enabling the complete range of simple and complex permit administration.

Accela's online permitting extends from an established base of jurisdictions for which it provides computerization over the past 20 years. The company was recreated in 1999 through the merger of Sierra Computer Systems Inc., OpenData Systems Inc. and Accela Corp. The new firm specializes in the sale of e-government interactive capabilities.

Approximately 120 of the 300 Accela-served localities have adopted VelocityHall, and Maury Blackman, vice president of corporate development for Accela, says that number is increasing rapidly. The product began operating on a test basis in fast-growing San Bernardino, Calif., in June.

Blackman says the key to success in the reconstruction arena is simplicity of use. A user can log on to VelocityHall directly through a jurisdiction's Web site and VelocityHall will mimic the look and operating style of the government site.

For a simple permit, the applicant logs on and then follows a seven-step process:

  1. Zero in on the correct address by filling in city and street name information. The site presents all possible addresses and the applicant clicks on the correct work location;
  2. Agree to the government's legal declaration associated with online application;
  3. Fill out contractor information, including license number;
  4. List work tasks to be undertaken consistent with the business license;
  5. Review project fee calculation which shows the government's permit fee and adds 10% plus $5 for VelocityHall;
  6. Pay all fees with credit card;
  7. Print out permit and go to work.

For new construction plans, which Blackman calls "the Holy Grail" of online permitting, the process is similar but provides greater opportunity for concurrent interaction between applicants and overseers.

Traditionally contractors deliver a bundle of drawings and plan documents to city hall where they maneuver from desk to desk, traveling through the planning and inspection offices until the packages mysteriously and unpredictably emerge on the other end. If changes are required, the package is returned to the applicant, updated, brought back to the reviews, where the process starts again.

With online filing, contractors upload CAD drawings and plans that are accessible to all planners and inspectors simultaneously. Each overseer may approve or withhold approval of their piece, and may attach comments. E-mail is automatically generated to inform the applicant that the status of the submission has changed. The applicant may make changes to the drawings or plans and resubmit them immediately online. The applicant can track all approvals as they are made over the Web.

"This greatly accelerates the approval process, which therefore accelerates the building process," Blackman says. "Our experience has shown that an approval process that used to take as much as six to eight weeks can now be performed in six to eight days."

These interactive relationships between government and constituents also enable people to pay traffic tickets and tax bills, apply for motor vehicle services and register to vote. It creates what is considered a government-to-business (G2B) or government-to-citizen (G2C) virtual relationship. Companies with a history of providing computerization to government have spun off into this sector and are providing online permitting services.

A Different Approach

Some companies are straying from first establishing a working relationship with the jurisdiction's computer system. These firms are driving automated permitting from the contractor to government rather than from government to contractors. This becomes a business-to-business-to-government (B2B2G) model rather than the more traditional G2B model.

NetClerk is an aggressive proponent of this contractor-oriented model. "We don't care how a city operates its permit review department," says NetClerk CEO Jeff Kraatz. "We will adapt to however they operate."

Their "agnostic" approach, he says, will speed widespread adoption of automated permitting. NetClerk now claims to be operating in 1,350 jurisdictions with a target soon of 2,500. Most recent areas to be served are Dallas and Minnesota's Twin Cities. Providing service to a large metropolitan area can require bringing on line 50 or more jurisdictions.

For NetClerk to enter a new community requires little if any contact with the local government. The company merely posts this jurisdiction's permitting forms to its site and transmits completed forms in the manner the government is most comfortable with, typically e-mail, fax or hand delivery. "We have an entire government relations department of five people who do nothing but proactively interface with cities to ensure accurate processes are developed between our two firms, compliance issues are met, and continual process improvement can occur," says Kraatz.

Some jurisdictions have refused to electronically process these permits, but most welcome the assistance that is free to the governments. Recently San Francisco Mayor Willie L. Brown commemorated the processing of 1,000 permits through NetClerk. "That's 1,000 times that a contractor didn't have to mess with traffic, parking and a line to wait in," Brown said in a statement.

NetClerk makes its money by charging contractors a monthly fee ranging from $100 to $2,000 per month, depending on usage. The company claims Home Deport contractors, Roto Rooter plumbers and Lenox heating as customers.

Kraatz says he expects this new offering to continue to provide significant growth, change and innovative partnerships. In mid-January the company announced the acquisition of $6.5 million in new venture funding.

Permits.com, New York City, uses a similar model and envisions a similar national presence. Currently its product mainly is in use in the Northeast and also Chicago, St. Louis, Dallas, Houston and throughout Florida, according to Saul Leopold, CEO.

Charles Rizzo & Associates, a zoning law consulting firm, originated the company. Permits.com promotes itself as having an understanding of the needs of permit filers and special insight into the desires of local governments. "It is important that we enter into cooperative relationship with government," says Stephen Rizzo. "We'd rather have great service in 1,000 cities than mediocre service in 2,000."

The company currently is taking part in a demonstration project in which a home is being built in Las Vegas using Web-based tools for design, permitting, procurement and project management. The Dot-Com Dream Home is billed as the first of its kind and is being permitted through Permits.com and Clark County government. An upcoming series of Home Again with Bob Villa will explore the on-line experiences. The project can be seen at www.dotcomdreamhome.com.

PermitsNow.com, Rockville, Md., provides online permitting and other services mainly on the East Coast. Last August, it received a new round of investment funding that will help it expand nationally. Immediate targets are Atlanta, Dallas, Phoenix and Orange County, Calif.

The firm has 20 years of experience in computerization and facilitates online permitting through both G2B and B2B2G models. It charges customers $16.95 per month plus $10 per transaction.

The company's first big splash is the completion of full coverage of the Baltimore-Washington D.C.-Richmond, Va., area, more than 50 jurisdictions including all 24 in Maryland.

According to CEO John Webster, PermitsNow.com promotes a close relationship with the local governments through a three-step process that examines current permitting and public works practices, installs the electronic permitting desk and finally provides complete integration with back office computerization to facilitate innovations such as plan review or wireless connection.

Along with companies with national aspirations, many more local and regional firms are moving their permit services to the Web. Ultimately, building contractors and designers in jurisdictions offering the new services will find a more pleasant, efficient and cost-effective process.

Roster of Online Permitting Companies Inc.
South San Francisco, Calif.
www.accela.com
VelocityHall Web-based software connecting to 120 jurisdictions for both simple permitting and complex plans administration.

CRW Associates
San Diego, Calif.
www.crwassoc.com
Permit Trak, part of Trak It suite In 10 years of operating, has provided full-function software for government in 50 jurisdictions.

CSDC Systems Inc.
Ontario, Canada and St. Louis, Mo.
www.csdcsystems.com
AMANDA Automates all functions within local government building departments in Canada and the U.S.

EZGov.com
Atlanta, Ga.
www.EZGov.com
EZGov LocalSuite E-government provider specializing in facilitating citizen business with government on line. In partnership with IBM.

GovHost.com
Columbia, S.C.
www.govhost.com
GovHost Suite Provides full networking and Web access to local government, mostly throughout the Southeast.

National Information Consortium (NIC)
Overland Park, Kans.
www.nicusa.com
NIC Permit Solutions Provides e-government solutions especially for state government. Handles 12 state's web portals. Partners with Tidemark.

NetClerk.com
South San Francisco, Calif.
www.netclerk.com
CityCentral Promotes online services for construction contractors. Says it is expanding nationally, and currently is in more than 1,000 locales.

Permits.com
New York City
www.permits.com
Permits.com Promotes service as complete form management for the construction industry. Now expanding from it Northeast base.

PermitsNow.com
Rockville, Md.
www.permitsnow.com
Permits Now Provides permit automation in the Baltimore-Washington D.C. metro area and throughout the Southeast. Funded for nationwide expansion.
[PermitsNow Closes May 1, 2001]

Permit Place
Tacoma, Wash.
www.permitplace.com
Provides permitting interface with jurisdiction mainly in upper Northwest.

Tidemark Solutions
Seattle, Wash.
www.tidemark.com
Tidemark e-Connect Internet-based solution for government interaction with citizens and businesses. Sixteen years in business, active in partnerships including NIC.

sponsors

 |   |   |   |   | 
2008 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
All Rights Reserved